Hair Drug Testing
False vs. Reality
Case Open: Hair drug testing is efficient, but not a popular course of drug testing, because it is therefore high-priced.
Reality: drug tests are indeed far more than expensive rather than a generalurinalysis–we’re talking dollars to pennies here–and is a newer form of drug testing, so most employers prefer for a general urine drug test. Psychemedics, the companythat makes hair drug tests in the United States, has been quite productive at lowering the price and increasing consciousness, but a whole trade from urine to hairhas a ways ahead.
Open: There is little conflict between a urine drug test, and hair drug testing.
Closed: untrue. A urine drug test is easier, cheaper, free, and at this place, an acknowledged process of drug testing. Hair drug testing is far less invasive–inducing it complete for delicate areas of testing, such as student drug tests–than its counterpart.
Open: Hair drug testing shall detect drug metabolite vulnerability and/or illicit drug use fromseveral years past.
Reality: Indeed, hair drug testing will uncover drug “use”–direct andindirect exposure–as many as seven years. The hair strand is analyzed related tomeasuring the years of a tree by its internal ring structure. Body hair is likea Velcro for all things ingested from your diet, the air you breathe, and yes, to any banned substances. This is a great benefit of hair drug testing, butalso puts a greater intellectual dilemma: is exposure real “use”?
Myths: Hair drug testing can be overcame by trimming your head.
Case Closed: While remaining void of hair may appear to make good sense when posed witha drug test that uses hair as its specimen, unfortunately for you, no, it doesn’t work.For example, not like one could go out, purchase a Bic razor, shave the head, and pass hair drug testprotocol simply because your bald! Funny, eh? The examiner will justclip some body hair. There is zero way to shave your path out of a hair drug test.
